Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
•Text learning was found to be less effective on screen than on paper.•Screen learning was consistently accompanied by overconfidence.•Practice and in-depth processing successfully eliminated screen inferiority.•Medium preference was associated with utilization of these methods.•Generally, in-depth processing was associated with attenuated overconfidence. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046 | Computers in Human Behavior |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Reading comprehension,E-learning,Human–computer interaction,Metacognitive monitoring,Metacomprehension,Overconfidence | Social psychology,Metacognitive Monitoring,E learning,Reading comprehension,Metacomprehension,Psychology,Overconfidence effect | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
35 | 0747-5632 | 9 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.87 | 8 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tirza Lauterman | 1 | 9 | 0.87 |
Rakefet Ackerman | 2 | 34 | 3.96 |