Title | ||
---|---|---|
Hippocampal volume change measurement: Quantitative assessment of the reproducibility of expert manual outlining and the automated methods FreeSurfer and FIRST. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
•Manual and automated hippocampal atrophy measurements had similar reproducibility.•Both microliter and percentage change had similar reproducibility between methods.•Analysis failed in 6.9% of cases for FIRST, 7.5% for FreeSurfer, and none for manual.•ADNI back-to-back scan–rescan scan pairs were used to analyze reproducibility. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.058 | NeuroImage |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Hippocampus,Manual segmentation,Automatic segmentation,Magnetic resonance imaging,Mild cognitive impairment,Alzheimer's disease | Hippocampal atrophy,Nuclear medicine,Data mining,Reproducibility,Computer science,Cognitive psychology,Neuroimaging,Quantitative assessment,Hippocampal formation,Cognitive impairment | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
92 | 1053-8119 | 11 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.63 | 19 | 8 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Emma R. Mulder | 1 | 11 | 0.63 |
Remko A. de Jong | 2 | 11 | 0.63 |
Dirk L. Knol | 3 | 27 | 2.32 |
Ronald A. van Schijndel | 4 | 23 | 1.70 |
K. S. Cover | 5 | 53 | 5.12 |
Pieter J. Visser | 6 | 11 | 0.63 |
frederik barkhof | 7 | 199 | 23.19 |
Hugo Vrenken | 8 | 119 | 7.93 |