Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We develop a model of abduction in abstract argumentation, where changes to an argumentation framework act as hypotheses to explain the support of an observation. We present dialogical proof theories for the main decision problems (i.e., finding hypotheses that explain skeptical/credulous support) and we show that our model can be instantiated on the basis of abductive logic programs. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2014 | 10.3233/978-1-61499-419-0-117 | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
DocType | Volume | ISSN |
Journal | 263 | 0922-6389 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
8 | 0.51 | 9 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Booth | 1 | 72 | 6.23 |
| Dov M. Gabbay | 2 | 8 | 0.51 |
| Souhila Kaci | 3 | 783 | 53.25 |
| Tjitze Rienstra | 4 | 89 | 10.84 |
| Leendert van der Torre | 5 | 2930 | 224.99 |