Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper presents an X-band chirp radar transceiver with bandwidth reduction for range detection. The radar transceiver includes a super-heterodyne receiver including an ADC, a direct-digital synthesizer (DDS) based transmitter and a phase-locked loop (PLL) synthesizer. In a modified Weaver architecture, the down-converted baseband signal is further mixed with another chirp signal through stretch processing. The resulting waveform bandwidth is greatly reduced and thus relaxes the power and bandwidth requirements of the on-chip ADC. Therefore, the proposed radar transceiver achieves power and bandwidth reductions without degrading its range resolution. The radar-on-chip (RoC) MMIC was implemented in a 0.13 μm SiGe technology with die area of 3.5 × 2.5 mm2. With a 2.2 V supply for analog/RF circuits and a 1.5 V supply for the digital portion, the chip consumes 326 mW in the receive mode and 333 mW in the transmit mode, respectively. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/JSSC.2014.2315650 | J. Solid-State Circuits |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
modified Weaver architecture,radar transmitters,voltage 2.2 V,X-band radar transceiver,stretch processing,SiGe,superheterodyne receivers,digital phase locked loops,transmitter,chirp signal,super-heterodyne receiver,receiver,DDS based transmitter,down-converted baseband signal,PLL,SiGe technology,RoC MMIC,voltage 1.5 V,PM,PLL synthesizer,MMIC,radio transceivers,phase-locked loop,radar-on-chip MMIC,radar,direct digital synthesis,FM,Ge-Si alloys,DAC,direct-digital synthesizer,DDS,size 0.13 mum,waveform bandwidth,bandwidth reduction,Chirp,size 3.5 mm,on-chip ADC,size 2.5 mm,range detection | Journal | 49 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
9 | 0018-9200 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 0 | 11 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jianjun Yu | 1 | 8 | 1.82 |
Feng Zhao | 2 | 16 | 2.64 |
Joseph Cali | 3 | 1 | 0.70 |
Fa Foster Dai | 4 | 143 | 29.84 |
Desheng Ma | 5 | 3 | 1.10 |
Xueyang Geng | 6 | 31 | 4.25 |
Yuehai Jin | 7 | 1 | 0.36 |
Yuan Yao | 8 | 1 | 0.36 |
Xin Jin | 9 | 1 | 0.36 |
J. David Irwin | 10 | 47 | 18.48 |
J. Yu | 11 | 68 | 41.71 |