Title | ||
---|---|---|
Building damage detection from post-quake remote sensing image based on fuzzy reasoning |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The paper presents an approach for building damage detection from high resolution remote sensing image using multi-feature analysis and the fuzzy reasoning procedure. The selected area of our study is in Yushu, which was strongly hit by 7.1-magnitude earthquake. The study area contains 101 buildings, of which 46 are collapsed and 55 are un-collapsed. First, the buildings were selected one-by-one from the GIS data and remote sensing image. Second, three categories of features were analyzed to describe the differences between the collapsed buildings and un-collapsed ones, including spectral feature, texture feature and gradient feature. Last, a final decision was made through considering the variety of feature parameters utilizing fuzzy reasoning. The overall accuracy of building damage detection was 91.09%, of the total 46 collapsed buildings, 42 were detected correctly by the proposed approach, giving 91.30% producer's accuracy. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6946476 | IGARSS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
remote sensing,fuzzy reasoning,multifeature analysis,collapsed building,geographic information systems,fuzzy reasoning procedure,disasters,uncollapsed buildings,building damage detection,china,gis data,spectral feature,damage detection,earthquakes,fuzzy logic,feature extraction,image classification,geophysical image processing,earthquake,texture feature,post quake remote sensing,yushu,image texture,buildings (structures),gradient feature,high resolution remote sensing image,accuracy | Data mining,Computer vision,Fuzzy reasoning,Computer science,Remote sensing,Image based,Quake (series),Feature extraction,Artificial intelligence | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2153-6996 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xin Ye | 1 | 25 | 8.36 |
Qi-ming Qin | 2 | 158 | 49.12 |
Mingchao Liu | 3 | 1 | 2.04 |
Jun Wang | 4 | 13 | 5.63 |
Jianhua Wang | 5 | 0 | 1.01 |