Title | ||
---|---|---|
What Happens With A Proportional Fair Cellular Scheduling When D2d Communications Underlay A Cellular Network? |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Device-to-Device (D2D) communications are seen as promising technology for future wireless systems. However, while underlying cellular networks they can negatively affect the performance of cellular communications when intra-cell spectrum sharing is enabled. The impact of D2D communications is not only seen on the cellular throughput, but also on the decision-making of the cellular scheduling policy. In this paper, we provide an impact assessment of D2D communications on the performance of Proportional Fair (PF) scheduling for a Long Term Evolution (LTE) multi-cell scenario through system-level simulations. Results show that due to excessive interference generated by D2D communications and depending on the accuracy of the link quality measure used to estimate the instantaneous data rate, a PF cellular scheduling policy may get stuck in an infinite loop and continuously selects the same User Equipments (UEs), which reduces the cellular throughput, or even approaches the performance of a Maximum Rate (MR)-based policy, thus affecting service coverage and fairness. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/WCNCW.2014.6934896 | 2014 IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (WCNCW) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
cellular network,throughput,bandwidth,interference,cellular communications,signal to noise ratio,computer architecture,ofdm,scheduling | Fair-share scheduling,Computer science,Scheduling (computing),Cellular communication,Computer network,Real-time computing,Cellular network,Maximum throughput scheduling,Throughput,Round-robin scheduling,Proportionally fair | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2167-8189 | 5 | 0.53 |
References | Authors | |
5 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Rodrigo L. Batista | 1 | 17 | 2.91 |
Carlos F. M. e Silva | 2 | 6 | 3.92 |
Jose Mairton B. da Silva Jr. | 3 | 8 | 1.65 |
Tarcisio F. Maciel | 4 | 123 | 17.75 |
Francisco Rodrigo P. Cavalcanti | 5 | 77 | 18.54 |