Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The increasing demands of big data applications have led researchers and practitioners to turn to in-memory computing to speed processing. For instance, the Apache Spark framework stores intermediate results in memory to deliver good performance on iterative machine learning and interactive data analysis tasks. To the best of our knowledge, though, little work has been done to understand Spark's architectural and microarchitectural behaviors. Furthermore, although conventional commodity processors have been well optimized for traditional desktops and HPC, their effectiveness for Spark workloads remains to be studied. To shed some light on the effectiveness of conventional generalpurpose processors on Spark workloads, we study their behavior in comparison to those of Hadoop, CloudSuite, SPEC CPU2006, TPC-C, and DesktopCloud. We evaluate the benchmarks on a 17-node Xeon cluster. Our performance results reveal that Spark workloads have significantly different characteristics from Hadoop and traditional HPC benchmarks. At the system level, Spark workloads have good memory bandwidth utilization (up to 50%), stable memory accesses, and high disk IO request frequency (200 per second). At the microarchitectural level, the cache and TLB are effective for Spark workloads, but the L2 cache miss rate is high. We hope this work yields insights for chip and datacenter system designers. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/IISWC.2014.6983036 | IISWC |
Keywords | DocType | Citations |
parallel processing,storage management,memory access,Apache Spark framework,microarchitectural behavior,memory bandwidth utilization,17-node Xeon cluster,iterative machine learning,Big Data,interactive data analysis,HPC benchmark,big data application,Hadoop,in-memory computing workload | Conference | 7 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.52 | 0 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tao Jiang | 1 | 15 | 3.31 |
| Qianlong Zhang | 2 | 7 | 1.20 |
| Hou Rui | 3 | 28 | 3.09 |
| Lin Chai | 4 | 8 | 1.92 |
| Sally A. Mckee | 5 | 1928 | 152.59 |
| Zhen Jia | 6 | 338 | 17.82 |
| SUN Ning-Hui | 7 | 1268 | 97.37 |