Title | ||
---|---|---|
On the potential of Wireless Sensor Networks for the in-field assessment of bio-physical crop parameters |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The exploration of bio-physical crop parameters is fundamental for the efficiency of smart agriculture. The leaf area index (LAI) is one of the most important crop parameters and serves as a valuable indicator for yield-limiting processes. It contributes to situational awareness ranging from agricultural optimization to global economy. In this paper, we investigate the potential of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) for the in-field assessment of bio-physical crop parameters. Our experiences using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) sensor nodes for the indirect and nondestructive LAI estimation are described. Furthermore, we present the design of our measurement architecture and results of various in-field measurements. By directly comparing the results achieved by WSN technology with those of a conventional approach, represented by a widely used standard instrument, we analyze whether bio-physical crop characteristics can be derived from WSN data with a desired accuracy. Moreover, we propose a simple approach to significantly enhance the accuracy of COTS sensor nodes for LAI estimation while, at the same time, reveal open challenges. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/LCNW.2014.6927698 | Local Computer Networks Workshops |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
agriculture,crops,wireless sensor networks,COTS sensor nodes,LAI estimation,WSN technology,agricultural optimization,bio-physical crop parameter,commercial off-the-shelf sensor node,global economy,leaf area index,smart agriculture,wireless sensor networks | Leaf area index,Key distribution in wireless sensor networks,Computer science,Situation awareness,Ranging,Mobile wireless sensor network,Wireless sensor network,Distributed computing | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
4 | 0.62 | 6 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Bauer, J. | 1 | 4 | 0.62 |
Bastian Siegmann | 2 | 11 | 5.18 |
Thomas Jarmer | 3 | 11 | 4.17 |
Nils Aschenbruck | 4 | 555 | 56.28 |