Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper compares different channel coding schemes, such as the short Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) proposed by NASA for TC applications, and Reed Solomon (RS) codes, in presence of pulsed jammers that causes burst errors. The burst error patterns are generated also considering the occurrence of cycle slips due to the pulsed jammers. Moreover, the effectiveness of introducing interleavers of different depths is investigated for both channel codes. The comparison shows that RS codes represent a robust solution in presence of pulsed jammers and they provide a better trade off performance/latency than short LDPC codes. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/ASMS-SPSC.2014.6934540 | ASMS/SPSC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
reed-solomon codes,channel coding,interleaved codes,jamming,parity check codes,satellite links,ldpc codes,nasa,rs codes,reed solomon codes,tt&c satellite links,burst error patterns,channel coding schemes,cycle slips,interleavers,pulsed jammers,short low-density parity-check codes,telecommand,cycle slip,jammer | Forward error correction,Concatenated error correction code,Low-density parity-check code,Turbo code,Serial concatenated convolutional codes,Electronic engineering,Reed–Solomon error correction,Linear code,Engineering,Tornado code | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2329-7093 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
1 | 3 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martinelli, P. | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Ernestina Cianca | 2 | 220 | 27.52 |
| Lorenzo Simone | 3 | 1 | 2.46 |