Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The choice of OFDM-based multi-carrier access techniques for LTE marked a fundamental and farsighted parting from preceding 3GPP networks. With OFDMA in the downlink and SC-FDMA in the uplink, LTE possesses a robust and adaptive multiple access scheme that facilitates many physical layer enhancements. Despite this flexibility, scheduling in LTE is a challenging functionality to design, especially in the uplink. Resource allocation in LTE is made complex, especially when considering its target packet-based services and mobility profiles, both current and emerging, in addition to the use of several physical layer enhancements. In this paper, we offer a tutorial on scheduling in LTE and its successor LTE-Advanced. We also survey representative schemes in the literature that have addressed the scheduling problem, and offer an evaluation methodology to be used as a basis for comparison between scheduling proposals in the literature. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/SURV.2013.1127.00161 | Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Long Term Evolution,Tutorials,frequency division multiple access,radio links,3GPP networks,LTE advanced,SC-FDMA,adaptive multiple access scheme,evaluation framework,mobility profiles,multicarrier access techniques,physical layer enhancements,survey framework,target packet based services,tutorial framework,uplink scheduling,3GPP,LTE,LTE-Advanced,SC-FDMA,carrier aggregation,coordinated multi-point transmission/reception,machine type communication,non-contiguous SC-FDMA,scheduling | Job shop scheduling,Scheduling (computing),Computer science,Network packet,Computer network,Physical layer,Resource allocation,Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing,Distributed computing,LTE Advanced,Telecommunications link | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
16 | 3 | 1553-877X |
Citations | PageRank | References |
46 | 1.60 | 22 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Najah A. Abu-Ali | 1 | 102 | 6.45 |
Abd-Elhamid M. Taha | 2 | 71 | 6.72 |
Mohamed Salah | 3 | 46 | 1.60 |
Hassanein, H.S. | 4 | 435 | 37.56 |