Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Due to the rapid development of Internet technology, the greater demand for multimedia services causes the traffic collisions increasing. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specified IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) for next generation network service. For the real-time multimedia service such as video streaming, it requires a large amount of bandwidth resource. Besides, the different ongoing media sessions may cause traffic collisions. In this paper, we propose a dynamic video streaming quality adaption method for IMS. The video quality will dynamic adjust according to the background traffic, reducing bandwidth congestion when overall network loading is high. The simulation results show that by adopting proposed video adaption method, the service quality and reliability can be maintained. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2014 | 10.1109/IIH-MSP.2014.237 | IIH-MSP |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
bandwidth congestion reduction,internet technology,real-time service,3gpp,service quality,media server resource function,multimedia content management system,3g mobile communication,quality of service,telecommunication network reliability,next generation network service,multimedia services,ip multimedia subsystem,ip networks,3rd generation partnership project,traffic collisions,service reliability,ims,background traffic,dynamic video streaming quality adaption method,video streaming,telecommunication traffic,ip multimedia subsystem, video streaming, background traffic, multimedia content management system, media server resource function,bandwidth resource,real-time systems | Next-generation network,Service quality,Computer science,Quality of service,Computer network,Wireless Multimedia Extensions,Real-time computing,Bandwidth (signal processing),IP Multimedia Subsystem,Video quality,The Internet | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.36 | 4 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shih-Wen Hsu | 1 | 14 | 2.47 |
| Song Chun Lin | 2 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Yong Ming Jheng | 3 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Wei Kuan Shih | 4 | 95 | 12.50 |
| Han Chieh Chao | 5 | 6 | 1.83 |