Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Conventional telecommunication techniques are optimized to communicate over long distances (>1 mi), subject to high attenuation, high crosstalk, and other deteriorations in transmission. A trend in telecommunication system architectures is to disperse the previously centralized switching centers, thereby providing switching within a few hundred feet of the subscriber. This creates an opportunity for great improvements in cost and performance for short distance communication links. A technique for low-power digital communication over short transmission lines that exploits this possibility is described. The typical power is more than an order of magnitude lower than the power required with conventional circuits. Associated with this technique are a tenfold reduction in the chip area occupied by the transmission line drivers and the elimination of coupling transformers. The power and chip-area reductions result from terminating and maintaining an open circuit at the receiver. These advantages make this line-driving technique particularly suitable for single-chip VLSI systems. > |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
1988 | 10.1109/26.2795 | IEEE Transactions on Communications |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
vlsi,crosstalk,digital communication systems,telecommunication transmission lines,attenuation,cost,coupling transformers,line-driving technique,low-power digital communication,open circuit,performance,short distance communication links,short transmission lines,single-chip vlsi systems,switching centres,telecommunication system architectures,transmission line drivers,unterminated transmission lines | Transmission line,Data transmission,Computer science,Electric power transmission,Electronic engineering,Chip,Normalization property,Systems architecture,Electronic circuit,Very-large-scale integration | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
36 | 6 | 0090-6778 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 1 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooperman, M. | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Sieber, R.W. | 2 | 3 | 0.91 |
| Moolenbeek, R. | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |