Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The authors propose an extension of the BAN logic to reason about a secure protocol in a hostile and/or unknown environment. Probabilities, attached to the sentences and rules of the logic, allow them to quantify the beliefs of principals and represent the insecurities and uncertainties of a real life situation. They develop a probabilistic logic and obtain tight lower bounds on the probability of the conclusion which correspond to the minimum trust that can be put on the goal of the protocol. This gives them a powerful tool to model and study the performance of secure protocols. They discuss a probabilistic semantic for BAN logic and apply the results to the Needham-Schroeder protocol. The paper concludes by discussing the merits of these results and mentioning some open problems |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
1992 | 10.1109/CSFW.1992.236785 | Franconia, NH |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
inference mechanisms,performance evaluation,protocols,security of data,uncertainty handling,BAN logic,Needham-Schroeder protocol,partial belief,performance,probabilistic reasoning,rules,secure protocols,sentences,tight lower bounds | Subjective logic,Probabilistic logic network,Computer science,Theoretical computer science,Artificial intelligence,Probabilistic argumentation,Probabilistic logic,Uncertainty handling,Universal composability | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
9 | 3.97 | 9 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Campbell, E.A. | 1 | 9 | 3.97 |
| Reihaneh Safavi-naini | 2 | 9 | 3.97 |
| Pleasants, P.A. | 3 | 9 | 3.97 |