Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
A simple comparison between "spatial MIMO" (multiple input-multiple output), "frequency MIMO", and coherent netted radar systems shows that better performance can be achieved by the incoherent processing approaches. This assumes that the MIMO techniques acquire independent samples and there is no a priori information available to the netted radar enabling the incoming signals to be phase-aligned (P.F. Sammartino et al., 2006). Here we consider a more detailed model for target backscatter in order to gain a deeper sight into the true potential of these radar signal processing techniques. The overall aim of this work is to understand the performances available when real targets are under surveillance and to understand which conditions make MIMO perform best or, at least, better than a netted radar system. The target models introduced here are a step towards this aim |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2006 | 10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1661479 | Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2006. ICASSP 2006 Proceedings. 2006 IEEE International Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
MIMO systems,backscatter,radar signal processing,MIMO radar performance,coherent netted radar systems,frequency MIMO radar system,incoherent processing approaches,multiple input-multiple output radar system,phase-aligned signals,radar signal processing techniques,spatial MIMO radar system,target backscatter,target model effects | Signal processing,Telecommunications,Computer science,A priori and a posteriori,Man-portable radar,Real-time computing,Artificial intelligence,Radar,Pattern recognition,Clutter,MIMO,Bistatic radar,Radar cross-section | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
5 | 1520-6149 | 1-4244-0469-X |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 1.18 | 0 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pier Francesco Sammartino | 1 | 68 | 5.86 |
| Chris J. Baker | 2 | 71 | 6.65 |
| Hugh D. Griffiths | 3 | 5 | 1.18 |