Title | ||
---|---|---|
Comparative analysis of VoIPv4 and VoIPv6 in a bandwidth-limited wireless LAN testbed |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Managing QoS of VoIP is a challenge especially in a heterogeneous network environment such as Internet where often exists limitations or bottlenecks for the bandwidth. As the Internet protocol is evolving to a new version (v6) that offers a bigger address space at the cost of a bigger header size, there has been unawareness and worry how the increased header size affects real-time traffic, especially in bandwidth-limited wireless systems. In practice there will always be subnetworks and applications in the Internet that does not support the header compression and QoS methods available. Therefore there is a needed to analyze how VoIPv6 works in a bandwidth-limited wireless environment that does not support e.g. header compression, in comparison to VoIPv4. This was studied in a bandwidth-limited wireless LAN testbed. This paper presents the measurement results with analysis |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2001 | 10.1109/ICC.2001.937338 | Communications, 2001. ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Internet telephony,bandlimited communication,performance evaluation,quality of service,speech codecs,telecommunication equipment testing,telecommunication traffic,wireless LAN,GSM codec,Internet,Internet protocol,LPC codec,PCM codec,QoS management,QoS methods,VoIPv4,VoIPv6,address space,bandwidth-limited wireless LAN testbed,bandwidth-limited wireless systems,comparative analysis,header compression,header size,heterogeneous network environment,measurement results,real-time traffic,subnetworks,voice codecs | Internet Protocol,Computer science,Quality of service,Testbed,Computer network,Real-time computing,Wi-Fi array,Heterogeneous network,Header,Wireless Application Protocol,The Internet | Conference |
Volume | ISBN | Citations |
3 | 0-7803-7097-1 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.41 | 0 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Mika Ylianttila | 1 | 986 | 110.90 |
Mikko Rapeli | 2 | 1 | 0.41 |
Juha-Pekka Mäkelä | 3 | 1 | 0.75 |
Terho Hautala | 4 | 1 | 0.41 |