Title | ||
---|---|---|
Adaptive Reduced-Rank Filtering using a Projection Operator Based on Joint Iterative Optimization of Adaptive Filters for CDMA Interference Suppression |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper proposes a novel adaptive reduced-rank filtering scheme based on the joint iterative optimization of adaptive filters. The proposed scheme consists of a joint iterative optimization of a bank of full-rank adaptive filters that constitutes the projection matrix and an adaptive reduced-rank filter that operates at the output of the bank of filters. We describe minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) expressions for the design of the projection matrix and the reduced-rank filter and simple least-mean squares (LMS) adaptive algorithms for its computationally efficient implementation. Simulation results for a CDMA interference suppression application reveals that the proposed scheme significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art reduced- rank schemes, while requiring a significantly lower computational complexity. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.1109/ICDSP.2007.4288514 | Cardiff |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
adaptive filters,code division multiple access,interference suppression,least mean squares methods,cdma,computational complexity,joint iterative optimization,least-mean squares algorithms,minimum mean-squared error,projection matrix,projection operator,reduced-rank filtering,iterative methods,filtering,filter bank,least mean square,least squares approximation,computational modeling,minimum mean squared error,algorithm design and analysis,minimum mean square error,adaptive filter,iteration method | Iterative method,Computer science,Control theory,Filter bank,Minimum mean square error,Filter (signal processing),Projection (linear algebra),Adaptive filter,Kernel adaptive filter,Adaptive algorithm | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
1-4244-0882-2 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
de Lamare, R.C. | 1 | 652 | 33.42 |
R. Sampaio-Neto | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |