Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The architecture of software systems is known to decay if no counter-measures are taken. In order to prevent this architectural erosion, the conformance of the actual system architecture to its intended architecture needs to be assessed and controlled; ideally in a continuous manner. To support this, we present the architecture conformance assessment capabilities of our quality analysis framework ConQAT. In contrast to other tools, ConQAT is not limited to the assessment of use-dependencies between software components. Its generic architectural model allows the assessment of various types of dependencies found between different kinds of artifacts. It thereby provides the necessary tool-support for flexible architecture conformance assessment in diverse contexts. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2010 | 10.1145/1810295.1810343 | Software Engineering, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
software architecture,software quality,ConQAT quality analysis framework,flexible architecture conformance assessment,software component,software system architecture | Space-based architecture,Applications architecture,Systems engineering,Software engineering,Computer science,Software architecture description,Solution architecture,Reference architecture,Software architecture,Enterprise architecture framework,View model | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
2 | 0270-5257 | 978-1-60558-719-6 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
16 | 0.78 | 10 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florian Deissenboeck | 1 | 770 | 35.84 |
| Lars Heinemann | 2 | 202 | 11.05 |
| Benjamin Hummel | 3 | 660 | 29.51 |
| Elmar Juergens | 4 | 743 | 31.07 |