Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Several proposals can be found, in the literature, to split the responsibility for the injection of harmonic pollution between the different loads and between loads and source. The methods have been tested mainly by means of simulations performed on an industrial test system identified by the IEEE Task Force on Harmonics Modeling and Simulation. The main problem of the simulation results is that they tend to disregard measurement uncertainty that, if not properly considered, might lead to an incorrect assessment of responsibility. This paper is therefore aimed at comparing the different available methods from a metrological point of view, in order to provide a wider and more complete basis for evaluating their performances. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/TIM.2012.2193700 | Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
pollution,responsibility assessment,harmonic pollution,power system harmonics,ieee task force,measurement uncertainty,power system simulation,harmonics modeling and simulation,power meters,harmonic pollution injection,load (electric),power system measurement,industrial test system,power quality,harmonic pollution metering method,power supply quality,harmonic simulation,performance evaluation,harmonic modeling,metrological point of view,harmonic pollution metering,uncertainty,harmonic analysis | Harmonic pollution,Task force,Modeling and simulation,Metrology,Measurement uncertainty,Control engineering,Electronic engineering,Harmonics,Harmonic analysis,Metering mode,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
61 | 11 | 0018-9456 |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-61284-946-1 | 3 | 0.46 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
A. Ferrero | 1 | 376 | 88.12 |
Marco Prioli | 2 | 3 | 1.81 |
Simona Salicone | 3 | 263 | 33.62 |