Title
Comparing a passive-elastic and a powered prosthesis in transtibial amputees.
Abstract
Passive-elastic foot prostheses cannot produce net work. Consequently, passive-elastic foot prostheses are limited in their ability to enable a biologically-realistic gait pattern in transtibial amputees. This shortcoming results in difficulties in balance and walking and leads to high levels of oxygen consumption during locomotion. A powered prosthesis has the potential for overcoming these problems and allowing transtibial amputees to achieve a biologically-realistic gait pattern. In this study, we compared the effects of the Ceterus by Össur, a traditional passive-elastic prosthesis, with those of the PowerFoot Biom (iWalk, Cambridge, MA), a recently-developed powered prosthesis. Gait biomechanics and metabolic cost were compared in a group of 5 transtibial amputees during level-ground walking. The results provided preliminary evidence that the use of a powered prosthesis leads to a decrease in the level of oxygen consumption during ambulation due to improvements in ankle kinematics and kinetics primarily during late stance. An average decrease in oxygen consumption of 8.4% was observed during the study when subjects used the PowerFoot compared to the Ceterus. An average increase of 54% was observed in the peak ankle power generation during late stance. Our results suggest that powered prostheses have the potential for significantly improving ambulation in transtibial amputees.
Year
DOI
Venue
2011
10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6092035
EMBC
Keywords
Field
DocType
peak ankle power generation,ankle kinematics,legged locomotion,oxygen consumption,walking,balance,prosthetics,o2,passive-elastic prosthesis,gait analysis,powerfoot biom,gait biomechanics,biologically-realistic gait pattern,locomotion,powered prosthesis,oxygen,transtibial amputees,ambulation,feature extraction,kinetic theory,power generation,kinetics
Prosthesis,Gait,Artificial limbs,Computer science,Physical therapy,During ambulation,Gait analysis,Biomechanics,Ankle
Conference
Volume
ISSN
ISBN
2011
1557-170X
978-1-4244-4122-8
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
0
0.34
2
Authors
7
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Chiara Mancinelli1262.85
Benjamin Patritti2162.00
Peppino Tropea300.68
Richard M Greenwald400.34
Rick Casler500.34
Hugh M. Herr657570.59
p bonato728239.26