Title | ||
---|---|---|
An effective decoupling method for matrix optimization and its application to the ICA problem |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Matrix optimization of cost functions is a common problem. Construction of methods that enable each row or column to be individually optimized, i.e., decoupled, are desirable for a number of reasons. With proper decoupling, the convergence characteristics such as local stability can be improved. Decoupling can enable density matching in applications such as independent component analysis (ICA). Lastly, efficient Newton algorithms become tractable after decoupling. The most common method for decoupling rows is to reduce the optimization space to orthogonal matrices. Such restrictions can degrade performance. We present a decoupling procedure that uses standard vector optimization procedures while still admitting nonorthogonal solutions. We utilize the decoupling procedure to develop a new decoupled ICA algorithm that uses Newton optimization enabling superior performance when the sample size is limited. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288271 | Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Newton method,convergence of numerical methods,independent component analysis,matrix algebra,ICA problem,Newton algorithms,convergence characteristic,cost function,decoupling procedure,density matching,effective decoupling method,independent component analysis,local stability,matrix optimization,standard vector optimization,Independent component analysis (ICA),blind source separation (BSS),matrix optimization | Approximation algorithm,Orthogonal matrix,Mathematical optimization,Matrix (mathematics),Vector optimization,Computer science,Matrix decomposition,Decoupling (cosmology),Independent component analysis,Newton's method | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1520-6149 E-ISBN : 978-1-4673-0044-5 | 978-1-4673-0044-5 | 13 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.63 | 6 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Matthew Anderson | 1 | 263 | 14.64 |
Xi-Lin Li | 2 | 547 | 34.85 |
Pedro A Rodriguez | 3 | 43 | 3.44 |
Tülay Adali | 4 | 1690 | 126.40 |