Title | ||
---|---|---|
The NORMAP Methodology: Lightweight Engineering of Non-functional Requirements for Agile Processes |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Agile software development methodologies, such as Scrum, have become very popular in quickly delivering quality Functional Requirements (FRs). However, agile methodologies have not sufficiently identified, modeled, and linked Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) -- such as security and performance -- with FRs in early requirements phases. This research presents a lightweight engineering of NFRs for agile processes. The proposed Non-functional Requirements Modeling for Agile Processes (NORMAP) Methodology identifies, links, and models Agile Loose Cases (ALCs) with Agile Use Cases (AUCs) and Agile Choose Cases (ACCs). A lightweight adapted version of the NFR Framework was developed including 25 important NFRs. Further, a risk-driven agile requirements implementation sequence and a visual tree-like view were developed. The methodology was validated through developing a Java-based modeling simulation tool and two case studies. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2012 | 10.1109/APSEC.2012.23 | APSEC), 2012 19th Asia-Pacific |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
formal specification,software prototyping,Java-based modeling simulation tool,NORMAP methodology,Scrum,agile choose cases,agile loose cases,agile software development,agile use cases,lightweight engineering,nonfunctional requirements,risk-driven agile requirements,visual tree-like view,NORMAP methodology,NORMATIC,Scrum,agile non-functional requirements,agile requirements modeling | Use case,Systems engineering,Software engineering,Agile Unified Process,Computer science,Lean software development,Requirements analysis,Agile usability engineering,Agile software development,Requirement,Empirical process (process control model) | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | ISBN |
1 | 1530-1362 | 978-1-4673-4930-7 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.40 | 4 |
Authors | ||
1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Weam M. Farid | 1 | 2 | 0.40 |