Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
This paper investigates different trade decision strategies under different market conditions so that a genetic algorithm could be designed to use the appropriate decision strategy. A trade decision strategy defines how a single action is decided upon based on a number of signals where each signal is a result of a technical analysis function. Using historical market data, a population is trained using a simple genetic algorithm employing crossover and mutation. Four genetic algorithms are used to evolve agents to trade, where each genetic algorithm uses a different trade decision strategy. The best individual from each evolved population is compared using an out-of-sample data set. Results show a significant difference in performance between the four decision strategies especially within bearish to moderately bullish stocks. Populations evolved using a weighted decision strategy performs better than strategies that are not weighted when trading bearish to moderately bullish stocks. Non-weighted decision strategies appear to out-perform weighted strategies when used on extremely bullish stock. This out-performance could be attributed to fewer trades made by non-weighted strategies compared to weighted ones. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2011 | 10.1109/CIFER.2011.5953553 | Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
commerce,decision making,genetic algorithms,bullish stock,equity market GA trader,genetic algorithm,historical market data,nonweighted decision strategies,technical analysis function,trade decision strategies | Econometrics,Population,Financial economics,Optimal decision,Crossover,Equity (finance),Stock (geology),Market data,Genetic algorithm,Technical analysis,Business | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
pending | 978-1-4244-9933-5 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 7 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jason F. Nicholls | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
Katherine Malan | 2 | 162 | 12.77 |
Andries P. Engelbrecht | 3 | 660 | 61.64 |