Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
UML Activity diagrams offer a very large set of constructs, however many of them seem scarcely used or even their existence is not known. Here, we present a precise view of the usage levels of these constructs by means of a survey, covering preliminarily books, courses, tutorials, and tools about UML. Results show that, among the 47 Activity diagrams constructs, a large majority of them seem to be scarcely used, while, only nine result widely used. This work is part of a larger project aimed at investigating the usage level of the UML diagrams and their constructs, also by means of a personal opinion survey intended for UML users. UML is really a huge notation, and as consequence, on one hand, it is difficult and time consuming to master it, and on the other hand, people tend, naturally, to consider only a part of it; by means of this empirical study we want to assess what are the most/less used UML diagrams/constructs. |
Year | Venue | Keywords |
---|---|---|
2014 | Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development | Unified Modeling Language,UML activity diagrams,UML constructs,Unified Modelling Language,activity diagram constructs,Empirical Study,Survey,UML Usage |
Field | DocType | ISBN |
Programming language,UML tool,Systems engineering,Computer science,Theoretical computer science,Communication diagram,Applications of UML,Object Constraint Language,Shlaer–Mellor method,Class diagram,UML state machine,Software engineering,Activity diagram | Conference | 978-9-8975-8065-9 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.41 | 14 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Gianna Reggio | 1 | 800 | 86.77 |
Maurizio Leotta | 2 | 262 | 32.08 |
Filippo Ricca | 3 | 1788 | 124.62 |
Diego Clerissi | 4 | 70 | 8.58 |