Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The use of wake-up receivers (WURs) in wireless body area networks (WBAN) has remarkable potential to improve energy efficiency. During the recent years, multiple WUR designs and architectures have been therefore proposed for WBANs and wireless sensor networks (WSN). Superregenerative oscillator (SRO) based architecture is inherently sensitive, which makes it an attractive choice for a WUR. It is known that to improve the selectivity and to reduce the energy consumption the quench frequency should be the same or in the order of data rate. Therefore, synchronization is required. To achieve this with low-power consumption, pulse width modulation is used to encode transferred address information. The decoder measures the pulse widths and uses uncertainty interval that enables loose synchronization between the transmitter and the receiver. The decoder is implemented and its power consumption is measured. Decoder operation is verified with simulations using the hardware description language simulator. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1109/ISMICT.2015.7107530 | ISMICT |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
body area networks,decoding,energy conservation,energy consumption,pulse width modulation,radio receivers,synchronisation,telecommunication power management,wireless sensor networks,sro based architecture,wban,wsn,decoder operation,energy consumption reduction,energy efficiency,hardware description language simulator,loose synchronization method,low-power superregenerative wake-up receiver,multiple wur designs,quench frequency,superregenerative oscillator based architecture,wireless body area networks,complex programmable logic device | Transmitter,Synchronization,Wireless,Computer science,Efficient energy use,Pulse-width modulation,Electronic engineering,Wireless sensor network,Energy consumption,Hardware description language | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2326-828X | 1 | 0.35 |
References | Authors | |
6 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juha Petäjäjärvi | 1 | 36 | 6.39 |
| Konstantin Mikhaylov | 2 | 184 | 31.02 |
| Heikki Karvonen | 3 | 58 | 10.16 |
| Risto Vuohtoniemi | 4 | 76 | 11.09 |
| Matti Hämäläinen | 5 | 160 | 14.05 |