Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The idea of 'frozen-in' magnetic field lines for ideal plasmas(1) is useful to explain diverse astrophysical phenomena(2), for example the shedding of excess angular momentum from protostars by twisting of field lines frozen into the interstellar medium. Frozen-in field lines, however, preclude the rapid changes in magnetic topology observed at high conductivities, as in solar flares(2,3). Microphysical plasma processes are a proposed explanation of the observed high rates(4-6), but it is an open question whether such processes can rapidly reconnect astrophysical flux structures much greater in extent than several thousand ion gyroradii. An alternative explanation(7,8) is that turbulent Richardson advection(9) brings field lines implosively together from distances far apart to separations of the order of gyroradii. Here we report an analysis of a simulation of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence at high conductivity that exhibits Richardson dispersion. This effect of advection in rough velocity fields, which appear non-differentiable in space, leads to line motions that are completely indeterministic or 'spontaneously stochastic', as predicted in analytical studies(10-13). The turbulent breakdown of standard flux freezing at scales greater than the ion gyroradius can explain fast reconnection of very large-scale flux structures, both observed (solar flares and coronal mass ejections) and predicted (the inner heliosheath, accretion disks, gamma-ray bursts and so on). For laminar plasma flows with smooth velocity fields or for low turbulence intensity, stochastic flux freezing reduces to the usual frozen-in condition. [GRAPHICS] . |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2013 | 10.1038/nature12128 | NATURE |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Astronomy and astrophysics, Astrophysical plasmas, Applied mathematics, Information technology | Journal | 497 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
7450 | 0028-0836 | 5 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.48 | 0 | 12 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Eyink | 1 | 5 | 0.48 |
| Cristian Lalescu | 2 | 5 | 0.48 |
| Hussein Aluie | 3 | 10 | 0.95 |
| Hussein Aluie | 4 | 10 | 0.95 |
| Alexander Szalay | 5 | 10 | 0.95 |
| Alexander Szalay | 6 | 10 | 0.95 |
| Gregory Eyink | 7 | 5 | 0.48 |
| Charles Meneveau | 8 | 5 | 0.48 |
| Randal Burns | 9 | 1955 | 115.15 |
| Ethan Vishniac | 10 | 5 | 0.81 |
| Kalin Kanov | 11 | 5 | 0.48 |
| Kai Bürger | 12 | 5 | 0.48 |