Title | ||
---|---|---|
Converting Between SMOS and SMAP Level-1 Brightness Temperature Observations Over Nonfrozen Land |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missions provide Level-1 brightness temperature (Tb) observations that are used for global soil moisture estimation. However, the nature of these Tb data differs: the SMOS Tb observations contain atmospheric and select reflected extraterrestrial (“Sky”) radiation, whereas the SMAP Tb data are corrected for these contributions, using auxiliary near-surface information. Furthermore, the SMOS Tb observations are multiangular, whereas the SMAP Tb is measured at 40° incidence angle only. This letter discusses how SMOS Tb, SMAP Tb, and radiative transfer modeling components can be aligned in order to enable a seamless exchange of SMOS and SMAP Tb data in soil moisture retrieval and assimilation systems. The aggregated contribution of the atmospheric and reflected Sky radiation is, on average, about 1 K for horizontally polarized Tb and 0.5 K for vertically polarized Tb at 40° incidence angle, but local and short-term values regularly exceed 5 K. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2437612 | Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Atmosphere,Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP),Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS),brightness temperature (Tb),galaxy,soil moisture | Assimilation (phonology),Atmosphere,Brightness temperature,Sea surface temperature,Diffuse sky radiation,Remote sensing,Atmospheric model,Sky,Atmospheric sciences,Radiative transfer,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
PP | 99 | 1545-598X |
Citations | PageRank | References |
4 | 0.45 | 2 |
Authors | ||
8 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
De Lannoy, G.J.M. | 1 | 4 | 0.45 |
Reichle, R.H. | 2 | 4 | 0.45 |
Jinzheng Peng | 3 | 4 | 1.81 |
Yann Kerr | 4 | 136 | 30.53 |
Gabrielle J. M. De Lannoy | 5 | 15 | 4.15 |
Rita Castro | 6 | 4 | 0.45 |
Edward J. Kim | 7 | 56 | 11.61 |
Qing Liu | 8 | 4 | 0.79 |