Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We use a data set of 1619 pigmented skin lesions images from three categories (common nevi, dysplastic nevi, and melanoma) to investigate the performance of four machine learning methods on the problem of classifying lesion images. The methods used were k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machines. The data sets were used to train the algorithms on the following tasks: to distinguish common nevi from dysplastic nevi and melanoma, and to distinguish melanoma from common nevi and dysplastic nevi. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize the performance of the models.Three of the methods (logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machines) achieved very good results (area under curve values about 0.96) on the problem of distinguishing melanoma from common and dysplastic nevi, and good results (area under curve values about 0.82) for the problem of distinguishing common nevi from dysplastic nevi and melanoma. The performance of k-nearest neighbors models was about 3 percentage points worse than that of the other methods. These results show that for classification problems in the domain of pigmented skin lesions, excellent results can be achieved with several algorithms. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2000 | 10.1007/978-1-4471-0513-8_25 | ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY |
Field | DocType | ISSN |
Data set,Receiver operating characteristic,Radial basis function kernel,Pigmented skin,Support vector machine,Artificial intelligence,Melanoma,Dysplastic nevus,Artificial neural network,Machine learning,Mathematics | Conference | 1431-6854 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 1 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephan Dreiseitl | 1 | 338 | 34.80 |
| Harald Kittler | 2 | 148 | 11.46 |
| harald ganster | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| michael binder | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |