Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The transition from a theory that turned out trivial to a consistent replacement need not proceed in terms of inconsistencies, which are negation gluts. Logics that tolerate gluts or gaps (or both) with respect to any logical symbol may serve as the lower limit for adaptive logics that assign a minimally abnormal consequence set to a given premise set. The same obtains for logics that tolerate a c... |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1093/logcom/ext019 | Journal of Logic and Computation |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Adaptive logics,handling inconsistency,gluts,gaps,ambiguity,zero logic | Journal | 26 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
1 | 0955-792X | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.41 | 0 | 1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diderik Batens | 1 | 148 | 20.23 |