Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Imaging genetics provides an enormous amount of functional–structural data on gene effects in living brain, but the sheer quantity of potential phenotypes raises concerns about false discovery. Here, we provide the first empirical results on false positive rates in imaging genetics. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2008 | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.058 | NeuroImage |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Genetics,Neuroimaging,False positives | Voxel,False positive rate,Developmental psychology,Imaging genetics,Multiple comparisons problem,Psychology,Region of interest,Neuroimaging,Type I and type II errors,Statistics,False positive paradox | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
40 | 2 | 1053-8119 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
17 | 1.69 | 6 |
Authors | ||
6 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg | 1 | 253 | 18.54 |
| Kristin K Nicodemus | 2 | 134 | 8.66 |
| Michael Egan | 3 | 17 | 1.69 |
| Joseph H Callicott | 4 | 27 | 3.98 |
| Venkata S. Mattay | 5 | 17 | 1.69 |
| Daniel R. Weinberger | 6 | 419 | 48.41 |