Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
ChIP-seq experiments are widely used to detect and study DNA-protein interactions, such as transcription factor binding and chromatin modifications. However, downstream analysis of ChIP-seq data is currently restricted to the evaluation of signal intensity and the detection of enriched regions (peaks) in the genome. Other features of peak shape are almost always neglected, despite the remarkable differences shown by ChIP-seq for different proteins, as well as by distinct regions in a single experiment.We hypothesize that statistically significant differences in peak shape might have a functional role and a biological meaning. Thus, we design five indices able to summarize peak shapes and we employ multivariate clustering techniques to divide peaks into groups according to both their complexity and the intensity of their coverage function. In addition, our novel analysis pipeline employs a range of statistical and bioinformatics techniques to relate the obtained peak shapes to several independent genomic datasets, including other genome-wide protein-DNA maps and gene expression experiments. To clarify the meaning of peak shape, we apply our methodology to the study of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 in K562 cell line and in megakaryocytes.Our study demonstrates that ChIP-seq profiles include information regarding the binding of other proteins beside the one used for precipitation. In particular, peak shape provides new insights into cooperative transcriptional regulation and is correlated to gene expression. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1186/s12859-015-0787-6 | BMC Bioinformatics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
ChIP-seq, Transcription regulation, GATA-1, Peak shape | Genome,Signal intensity,Plasma protein binding,Biology,Bioinformatics,Chromatin immunoprecipitation,Genetics,Cluster analysis,Chromatin,DNA microarray,Transcription factor | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
16 | 1 | 1471-2105 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
3 | 0.50 | 8 |
Authors | ||
7 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marzia A Cremona | 1 | 6 | 2.31 |
| Laura M. Sangalli | 2 | 43 | 5.37 |
| Simone Vantini | 3 | 60 | 9.26 |
| Gaetano I Dellino | 4 | 3 | 0.50 |
| Pier Giuseppe Pelicci | 5 | 7 | 2.76 |
| Piercesare Secchi | 6 | 70 | 11.12 |
| Laura Riva | 7 | 3 | 0.84 |