Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Incentivizing effort and eliciting truthful responses from agents in the absence of verifiability is a major challenge faced while crowdsourcing many types of evaluation tasks like labeling images, grading assignments in online courses, etc. In this paper, we propose new reward mechanisms for such settings that, unlike most previously studied mechanisms, impose minimal assumptions on the structure and knowledge of the underlying generating model, can account for heterogeneity in the agents' abilities, require no extraneous elicitation from them, and furthermore allow their beliefs to be (almost) arbitrary. Moreover, these mechanisms have the simple and intuitive structure of output agreement mechanisms, which, despite not incentivizing truthful behavior, have nevertheless been quite popular in practice. We achieve this by leveraging a typical characteristic of many of these settings, which is the existence of a large number of similar tasks. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2015 | CoRR | Mathematical optimization,Grading (education),Computer science,Simulation,Crowdsourcing,Human–computer interaction |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1507.07045 | 8 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.56 | 9 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vijay Kamble | 1 | 50 | 7.19 |
| Nihar B. Shah | 2 | 1202 | 77.17 |
| david marn | 3 | 11 | 1.33 |
| Abhay Parekh | 4 | 96 | 9.33 |
| Kannan Ramchandran | 5 | 9401 | 1029.57 |