Title | ||
---|---|---|
Robust multicomponent LFM signals synthesis algorithm based on masked ambiguity function |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Wigner distribution (WD) based multiple components linear frequency modulation (LFM) signal synthesis method (SSM) is often adversely affected by cross-terms. Masked WD (MWD) is one of the widely used cross-term suppression techniques in practice due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, the cross-terms are hardly masked out when auto-terms and cross-terms are overlapped (Case I) or the components are very close to each other in the time-frequency (TF) plane (Case II). To solve these problems, we present a robust ambiguity function (AF) based approach for multicomponent signals synthesis. This algorithm consists of two stages. First, a SSM from the AF is proposed according to matrix rearrangement and eigenvalue decomposition. However, the existence of cross-term makes the signal synthesis entirely erroneous. To settle this issue, we present a masked AF (MAF) algorithm based on Radon and its inverse transforms in the second stage. Applying the presented algorithm, multicomponent signals can be synthesized efficiently even in Case I and Case II. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed algorithm. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1016/j.dsp.2015.04.003 | Digital Signal Processing |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Multicomponent signals,Signal decomposition,Signal synthesis,Ambiguity function,Radon transform | Ambiguity function,Inverse,Wigner distribution function,Pattern recognition,Matrix (mathematics),Algorithm,Eigendecomposition of a matrix,Signal synthesis,Artificial intelligence,Frequency modulation,Radon transform,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
44 | C | 1051-2004 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.37 | 14 |
Authors | ||
6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Jia Su | 1 | 12 | 1.24 |
Haihong Tao | 2 | 16 | 2.30 |
Xuan Rao | 3 | 38 | 3.50 |
Jian Xie | 4 | 31 | 8.39 |
Dawei Song | 5 | 2 | 0.37 |
Cao Zeng | 6 | 43 | 4.65 |