Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We analyze the acceptability dynamics of arguments through the proposal of two different kinds of minimal sets of arguments, core and remainder sets which are somehow responsible for the acceptability/rejection of a given argument. We develop a study of the consequences of breaking the construction of such sets towards the acceptance, and/or rejection, of an analyzed argument. This brings about the proposal of novel change operations for abstract argumentation first, and for logic-based argumentation, afterwards. The analysis upon logic-based argumentation shows some problems regarding the applicability of the standard semantics. In consequence, a reformulation of the notion of admissibility arises for accommodating the standard semantics upon logic-based argumentation. Finally, the proposed model is formalized in the light of the theory of belief revision by characterizing the corresponding operations through rationality postulates and representation theorems. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1007/978-3-319-30024-5_1 | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Argumentation,Belief revision,Argumentation dynamics | Mathematical economics,Rationality,Computer science,Argumentation theory,Remainder,Theoretical computer science,Artificial intelligence,Probabilistic argumentation,Semantics,Belief revision | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
9616 | 0302-9743 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 13 | 1 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Martín O. Moguillansky | 1 | 84 | 7.55 |