Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We present a theory of security testing based on the basic distinction between system specifications and security requirements. Specifications describe a system's desired behavior over its interface. Security requirements, in contrast, specify desired properties of the world the system lives in. We propose the notion of a security rationale, which supports reductive security arguments for deriving a system specification and assumptions on the system's environment sufficient for fulfilling stated security requirements. These reductions give rise to two types of tests: those that test the system with respect to its specification and those that test the validity of the assumptions about the adversarial environment. It is the second type of tests that distinguishes security testing from functional testing and defies systematization and automation. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1007/978-3-319-30806-7_1 | ESSoS |
Field | DocType | Citations |
Security testing,Security engineering,Computer science,Computer security,System testing,Software security assurance,System requirements specification,Non-functional testing,Computer security model,Fault injection | Conference | 2 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 13 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad Torabi Dashti | 1 | 133 | 14.24 |
| David A. Basin | 2 | 4930 | 281.93 |