Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Data processing systems impose multiple views on data as it is processed by the system. These views include spreadsheets, databases, matrices, and graphs. There are a wide variety of technologies that can be used to store and process data through these different steps. The Lustre parallel file system, the Hadoop distributed file system, and the Accumulo database are all designed to address the largest and the most challenging data storage problems. There have been many ad-hoc comparisons of these technologies. This paper describes the foundational principles of each technology, provides simple models for assessing their capabilities, and compares the various technologies on a hypothetical common cluster. These comparisons indicate that Lustre provides 2x more storage capacity, is less likely to loose data during 3 simultaneous drive failures, and provides higher bandwidth on general purpose workloads. Hadoop can provide 4x greater read bandwidth on special purpose workloads. Accumulo provides 10
<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">5</sup>
lower latency on random lookups than either Lustre or Hadoop but Accumulo's bulk bandwidth is 10x less. Significant recent work has been done to enable mix-and-match solutions that allow Lustre, Hadoop, and Accumulo to be combined in different ways. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1109/HPEC.2015.7322476 | 2015 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Insider,Lustre,Hadoop,Accumulo,Big Data,Parallel Performance | Distributed File System,Metadata,File system,Computer science,Computer data storage,Server,Data processing system,Distributed database,Lustre (mineralogy),Operating system,Distributed computing | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
abs/1507.02357 | 2377-6943 | 3 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.47 | 15 | 14 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Kepner | 1 | 606 | 61.58 |
| William Arcand | 2 | 175 | 17.77 |
| David Bestor | 3 | 181 | 19.08 |
| Bill Bergeron | 4 | 168 | 16.57 |
| Chansup Byun | 5 | 180 | 19.21 |
| Lauren Edwards | 6 | 37 | 2.62 |
| Vijay Gadepally | 7 | 449 | 50.53 |
| Matthew Hubbell | 8 | 192 | 20.93 |
| Peter Michaleas | 9 | 201 | 20.93 |
| Julie Mullen | 10 | 138 | 15.22 |
| Andrew Prout | 11 | 182 | 18.78 |
| Antonio Rosa | 12 | 170 | 17.67 |
| Charles Yee | 13 | 147 | 15.14 |
| Albert Reuther | 14 | 335 | 37.32 |