Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Gender recognition is a topic of high interest especially in the growing field of audience measurement techniques for digital signage applications. Usually, supervised approaches are employed and they require a preliminary training phase performed on large datasets of annotated facial images that are expensive e.g. MORPH and, anyhow, they cannot be updated to keep track of the continuous mutation of persons' appearance due to changes of fashions and styles e.g. hairstyles or makeup. The use of small-sized and then updatable in a easier way datasets is thus high desirable but, unfortunately, when few examples are used for training, the gender recognition performances dramatically decrease since the state-of-art classifiers are unable to handle, in a reliable way, the inherent data uncertainty by explicitly modeling encountered distortions. To face this drawback, in this work an innovative classification scheme for gender recognition has been introduced: its core is the Minimax approach, i.e. a smart classification framework that, including a number of existing regularized regression models, allows a robust classification even when few examples are used for training. This has been experimentally proved by comparing the proposed classification scheme with state of the art classifiers SVM, kNN and Random Forests under various pre-processing methods. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1007/978-3-319-25903-1_36 | ACIVS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Gender classification,Minimax,Soft biometrics | Drawback,Data mining,Minimax,Soft biometrics,Computer science,Regression analysis,Digital signage,Artificial intelligence,Random forest,Computer vision,Pattern recognition,Classification scheme,Support vector machine,Machine learning | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
9386 | 0302-9743 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 12 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Marco Del Coco | 1 | 21 | 5.20 |
Pierluigi Carcagnì | 2 | 31 | 7.19 |
Marco Leo | 3 | 69 | 12.01 |
Cosimo Distante | 4 | 53 | 15.36 |