Title
Knowing what he could have shown: The role of alternatives in children's evaluation of under-informative teachers.
Abstract
What underlies young children’s failure in evaluating underinformative teachers? We explore the hypothesis that children have difficulty representing relevant alternatives; knowing what the teacher could have done. Children rated two teachers who demonstrated toys to a naive learner. One group first observed a fully informative teacher and then an underinformative teacher, while the other group saw the reverse order. Sixand seven-year-olds successfully rated the underinformative teacher lower than the fully-informative teacher regardless of the order (Exp.1). However, fourand five-yearolds showed this pattern only when they saw the fully informative teacher first (Exp.2). Given a binary choice after seeing both teachers, four-year-olds showed a preference for the fully informative teacher (Exp.3). We discuss these results in light of recent literature on children’s understanding of pragmatic violations in linguistic communication; the contrast between the fully informative vs. under-informative teachers might help children understand what the teacher could have shown.
Year
Venue
Field
2015
CogSci
Social psychology,Developmental psychology,Psychology,Cognitive psychology
DocType
Citations 
PageRank 
Conference
1
0.44
References 
Authors
0
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Hyowon Gweon11015.77
Mika Asaba213.82