Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The emergence of digital pathology has enabled numerous quantitative analyses of histopathology structures. However, most pathology image analyses are limited to two-dimensional datasets, resulting in substantial information loss and incomplete interpretation. To address this, we have developed a complete framework for three-dimensional whole slide image analysis and demonstrated its efficacy on 3D vessel structure analysis with liver tissue sections. The proposed workflow includes components on image registration, vessel segmentation, vessel cross-section association, object interpolation, and volumetric rendering. For 3D vessel reconstruction, a cost function is formulated based on shape descriptors, spatial similarity and trajectory smoothness by taking into account four vessel association scenarios. An efficient entropy-based Relaxed Integer Programming (eRIP) method is proposed to identify the optimal inter-frame vessel associations. The reconstructed 3D vessels are both quantitatively and qualitatively validated. Evaluation results demonstrate high efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method, suggesting its promise to support further 3D vessel analysis with whole slide images. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2015 | 10.1109/ISBI.2015.7163845 | 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Whole Slide Image Analysis,3D Vessel Analysis,Vessel Reconstruction,Digital Pathology | Iterative reconstruction,Computer vision,Volume rendering,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Interpolation,Digital pathology,Image segmentation,Artificial intelligence,Smoothness,Image registration,Trajectory | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
2015 | 1945-7928 | 4 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.43 | 6 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yanhui Liang | 1 | 16 | 6.50 |
Fusheng Wang | 2 | 17 | 3.14 |
Darren Treanor | 3 | 121 | 13.20 |
Derek R. Magee | 4 | 363 | 35.94 |
George Teodoro | 5 | 150 | 22.18 |
Yangyang Zhu | 6 | 5 | 0.79 |
Jun Kong | 7 | 106 | 17.74 |