Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among online self-, peer-, external- and instructor-assessments: The competitive effect. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In the last few years, self- and peer-assessment have been increasingly employed not only as an evaluation method, but also as a learning procedure. The consistency and difference between self- and peer-assessments as compared to instructor-assessments have been previously studied, and a friendship bias was discovered. In this study, we introduce external-assessment (products are assessed by students from a different university that are enrolled in a similar course), and compare self-, peer-, external- and instructor-assessments. The experience was conducted at two different universities separated by a significant distance, during two consecutive years, including a total of 97 students. At both universities, students developed websites and online tools were employed to organise the different types of assessments. The obtained results indicate that there is a high-level of consistency across the different kinds of assessments. Moreover, a competitive effect was discovered: students tended to award higher grades to students from their same university while they were harsher with the products from a distant university. From the learning perspective, and according to the students' final grade, the assessment experience correlated with learning gains. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.061 | Computers in Human Behavior |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Self-assessment,Peer-assessment,External-assessment,Competitive effect,Online-tools | Journal | 60 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
0747-5632 | 2 | 0.41 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| César Domínguez | 1 | 95 | 18.93 |
| Arturo Jaime Elizondo | 2 | 3 | 2.05 |
| Ana Sánchez | 3 | 2 | 0.41 |
| José Miguel Blanco | 4 | 2 | 0.41 |
| Jónathan Heras | 5 | 94 | 23.31 |