Title
Six Sigma Enablers In Mexican Manufacturing Companies: A Proposed Model
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to extend the understanding of Six Sigma (SS) and the underlying dimensions of its critical success factors (CSF) via an analysis of the effects of top management support (TMS), implementation strategy (IS), and collaborative team (CT) on project performance (PP) in Mexican manufacturing companies.Design/methodology/approach - Based on a SS literature review, a survey was conducted to capture practitioners' viewpoints about CSFs for SS implementation and their impact on performance in manufacturing companies. A factor analysis and structural equation modeling were conducted in order to identify and analyze causal relationships.Findings - The results suggest that CSFs grouped in the constructs TMS, IS, and CT have a positive impact on PP as measured by cost reduction, variation reduction, and quality improvement.Research limitations/implications - Although the empirical data collected supported the proposed model, results might differ among organizations in different countries. In addition, the study did not analyze a unique performance metric; instead, general PP dimensions were used.Practical implications - Boosting the TMS, IS, and CT enhances positive PP of SS in manufacturing companies.Originality/value - IS as a construct has not been studied exhaustively; this work contributes to a better understanding of it and its impact on PP. Additionally, studies of SS in Latin America are limited, so this study gives a complementary vision to practitioners and researchers about it.
Year
DOI
Venue
2016
10.1108/IMDS-06-2015-0265
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS
Keywords
Field
DocType
Six Sigma, Structural equation model, Critical success factors, Factor analysis
Critical success factor,Six Sigma,Structural equation modeling,Viewpoints,Top management,Engineering,Quality management,Management science,Operations management,Cost reduction,Process management
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
116
5
0263-5577
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
0
0.34
16
Authors
5