Paper Info
Title
Inducing and Mitigating a Self-Reinforcing Degradation in Decision-making Teams.
Abstract
The models in this paper demonstrate how self-reinforcing error due to positive feedback can lead to overload and saturation of decision-making elements, and ultimately the cascading collapse of an organization due to the propagation of overload and erroneous decisions throughout the organization. We begin the paper with an analysis of the stability of the decision-making aspects of command organizations from a system-theoretic perspective. A simple dynamic model shows how an organization can enter into a self-reinforcing cycle of increasing decision workload until the demand for decisions exceeds the decision-making capacity of the organization. We then extend the model to more complex networked organizations and show that they also experience a form of self-reinforcing degradation. In particular, we find that the degradation in decision quality has a tendency to propagate through the hierarchical structure, i.e. overload at one location affects other locations by overloading the higher-level components which then in turn overload their subordinates. Our computational experiments suggest several strategies for mitigating this type of malfunction: dumping excessive load, empowering lower echelons, minimizing the need for coordination, using command-by-negation, insulating weak performers, and applying on-line diagnostics. We describe a method to allocate decision responsibility and arrange information flow dynamically within a team of decision-makers for command and control.
Year
Venue
Field
2016
arXiv: Systems and Control
Information flow (information theory),Mathematical optimization,Command and control,Workload,Operations research,Risk analysis (engineering),Decision quality,Engineering
DocType
Volume
Citations 
Journal
abs/1607.08139
0
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.34
2
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Paul Hubbard100.34
Alexander Kott27921.07
Michael Martin318418.09