Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In recent years, the analog-to-information converter (AIC), based on compressed sensing (CS) paradigm, is a promising solution to overcome the performance and energy-efficiency limitations of traditional analog-to-digital converters (ADC). Especially, AIC can enable sub-Nyquist signal sampling proportional to the intrinsic information in biomedical applications. However, the legacy AIC structure is tailored toward specific applications, which lacks of flexibility and prevents its universality. In this paper, we introduce a novel programmable AIC architecture, Pro-AIC, to enable effective configurability and reduce its energy overhead by integrating efficient multiplexing hardware design. To improve the quality and time-efficiency of Pro-AIC configuration, we also develop a rapid configuration algorithm, called RapSpiral, to quickly find the near-optimal parameter configuration in Pro-AIC architecture. Specifically, we present a design metric, trade-off penalty, to quantitatively evaluate the performance-energy trade-off. The RapSpiral controls a penalty-driven shrinking triangle to progressively approximate to the optimal trade-off. Our proposed RapSpiral is with log(n) complexity yet high accuracy, without pretraining and complex parameter tuning procedure. RapSpiral is also probable to avoid the local minimum pitfalls. Experimental results indicate that our RapSpiral algorithm can achieve more than 30x speedup compared with the brute force algorithm, with only about 3% trade-off compromise to the optimum in Pro-AIC. Furthermore, the scalability is also verified on larger size benchmarks. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1145/2934583.2934596 | ISLPED |
Field | DocType | Citations |
Brute-force search,Computer science,Electronic engineering,Converters,Agile software development,Sampling (statistics),Multiplexing,Compressed sensing,Scalability,Speedup | Conference | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 7 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aosen Wang | 1 | 87 | 11.07 |
| Zhanpeng Jin | 2 | 52 | 5.26 |
| Wenyao Xu | 3 | 615 | 77.06 |