Paper Info
Title
Stress Effects in Vowel Perception as a Function of Language-Specific Vocabulary Patterns.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Evidence from spoken word recognition suggests that for English listeners, distinguishing full versus reduced vowels is important, but discerning stress differences involving the same full vowel (as in mu- from music or museum) is not. In Dutch, in contrast, the latter distinction is important. This difference arises from the relative frequency of unstressed full vowels in the two vocabularies. The goal of this paper is to determine how this difference in the lexicon influences the perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Methods: All possible sequences of two segments (diphones) in Dutch and in English were presented to native listeners in gated fragments. We recorded identification performance over time throughout the speech signal. The data were here analysed specifically for patterns in perception of stressed versus unstressed vowels. Results: The data reveal significantly larger stress effects (whereby unstressed vowels are harder to identify than stressed vowels) in English than in Dutch. Both language-specific and shared patterns appear regarding which vowels show stress effects. Conclusion: We explain the larger stress effect in English as reflecting the processing demands caused by the difference in use of unstressed vowels in the lexicon. The larger stress effect in English is due to relative inexperience with processing unstressed full vowels. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
Year
DOI
Venue
2017
10.1159/000447428
PHONETICA
Field
DocType
Volume
Phonetics,Psychology,Speech recognition,Frequency,Lexicon,Vowel,Speech perception,Vocabulary,Perception,Linguistics,Speech Acoustics
Journal
74
Issue
ISSN
Citations 
2
0031-8388
0
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.34
0
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Natasha Warner1569.72
Anne Cutler23911.92