Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In this paper, we propose a novel anti-phishing scheme, image code-based anti-phishing scheme ICAP, for securing mobile access through an image code. The proposed scheme can protect mobile users from phishing attack and side-glance attack which are threats to mobile environment. The proposed scheme employs the image code as the interaction between a mobile device and a server. This image code can maintain the quality of user-interface and protect the user from the side-glance attack. The proposed scheme basically uses the quick response code, which is a famous image code and has the human-unreadable property. Moreover, we propose two novel algorithms based on image code to improve our basic scheme; image key encryption, and image code identity-based encryption. The proposed scheme can choose one of two algorithms for its objective, and each algorithm has its own advantage. Image key encryption is a symmetric algorithm that can improve the transmission and encryption delay and reduces the power consumption. Image code identity-based encryption is an identity-based encryption algorithm which has the advantage of identity-based encryption. Our implementation result shows that our ICIP scheme can defend the phishing attack and side-glance attack, and shows the superiority of delay, power consumption, and accuracy. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1002/sec.1548 | Security and Communication Networks |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
mobile security,anti‐phishing,image code,image key encryption,identity‐based encryption | Multiple encryption,Watermarking attack,Computer security,Computer science,Attribute-based encryption,Computer network,Encryption,40-bit encryption,Probabilistic encryption,On-the-fly encryption,56-bit encryption | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
9 | 16 | 1939-0114 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 9 |
Authors | ||
4 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mungyu Bae | 1 | 23 | 5.69 |
| Jiyeon Lee | 2 | 10 | 2.68 |
| Suk Kyu Lee | 3 | 29 | 7.85 |
| Hwangnam Kim | 4 | 350 | 51.38 |