Title | ||
---|---|---|
Limitations of Coverability Trees for Context-Free Parallel Communicating Grammar Systems and Why these Grammar Systems are not Linear Space. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Coverability trees offer a finite characterization of all the derivations of a context-free. parallel grammar system (CF-PCGS). Their finite nature implies that they necessarily omit some information about these derivations. We demonstrate that the omitted information is most if not all of the time too much, and so coverability trees are not useful as an analysis tool except for their limited use already considered in the paper that introduces them (namely, determining the decidability of certain decision problems over PCGS). We establish this result by invalidating an existing proof that synchronized CF-PCGS are less expressive than context-sensitive grammars. Indeed, we discover that this proof relies on coverability trees for CF-PCGS, but that such coverability trees do not in fact contain enough information to support the proof. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1142/S0129626416500122 | PARALLEL PROCESSING LETTERS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Theory of computation,formal languages,formal grammar,Turing completeness,parallel communicating grammar system,coverability trees | Decision problem,Programming language,Formal language,Turing completeness,Regular tree grammar,Computer science,Theoretical computer science,Decidability,Grammar,Formal grammar,Theory of computation | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
26 | 3 | 0129-6264 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 5 |
Authors | ||
2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Stefan D. Bruda | 1 | 62 | 12.18 |
Mary Sarah Ruth Wilkin | 2 | 0 | 0.68 |