Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We compare the effectiveness of four different syntactic CCG parsers for a semantic slot-filling task to explore how much syntactic supervision is required for downstream semantic analysis. This extrinsic, task-based evaluation provides a unique window to explore the strengths and weaknesses of semantics captured by unsupervised grammar induction systems. We release a new Freebase semantic parsing dataset called SPADES (Semantic PArsing of DEclarative Sentences) containing 93K cloze-style questions paired with answers. We evaluate all our models on this dataset. Our code and data are available at this https URL |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.18653/v1/D16-1214 | EMNLP |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Conference | abs/1609.09405 | 3 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 9 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yonatan Bisk | 1 | 196 | 17.54 |
Siva Reddy | 2 | 345 | 21.37 |
John Blitzer | 3 | 3330 | 193.45 |
Julia Hockenmaier | 4 | 1782 | 114.23 |
Mark Steedman | 5 | 1795 | 238.27 |