Title
Validation of the Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES) in an English-Speaking Sample.
Abstract
Objective: The goal for this study was to develop an English translation of the Attention-Related Driving Errors Scale (ARDES-US) and to determine its potential relationship with driver history and other demographic variables. Background: Individual differences in performance on vigilance and cognitive tasks are well documented, but less is known about susceptibility to attention-related errors while driving. The ARDES has been developed and administered in both Spanish and Chinese but to our knowledge has never been administered or examined in an English-speaking population. Method: Two hundred ninety-six English-speaking individuals completed a series of self-report measures, including the ARDES-US, Attention-Related Cognitive Errors Scale, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, and Cognitive Failures Questionnaire. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis using maximum-likelihood estimates with robust standard errors revealed results largely consistent with previous versions of the ARDES, namely, the ARDES-Spain and ARDES-Argentina. Additionally, a number of new results emerged. Specifically, women, drivers who received traffic tickets within the previous 2 years, and those with a lower level of education all had a greater propensity toward self-reported driver inattention as measured by the ARDES-US. Further analyses revealed that these findings were independent of age, years of driving experience, and driving frequency. Conclusion: These results suggest that the ARDES-US is a valid and reliable measure of driver inattention with an English-speaking American sample. Application: Potential applications of the ARDES-US include identifying individuals who are at greater risk of attention-related errors while driving and suggesting individually tailored training and safety countermeasures.
Year
DOI
Venue
2016
10.1177/0018720816657927
HUMAN FACTORS
Keywords
Field
DocType
driver inattention,driver behavior,attentional processes,individual differences,survey translation
Social psychology,Population,Confirmatory factor analysis,Simulation,Human factors and ergonomics,Elementary cognitive task,Vigilance (psychology),Injury prevention,Engineering,Cognition,Psychometrics
Journal
Volume
Issue
ISSN
58.0
8.0
0018-7208
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
0
0.34
3
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Daniela Barragán100.34
Daniel M. Roberts230.83
Carryl Baldwin3435.57