Title | ||
---|---|---|
Robust Detection Of Single And Double Persistent Scatterers In Urban Built Environments: The Tomo-Psinsar Method |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we develop a SAR tomography-based persistent scatterer interferometry (Tomo-PSInSAR) method to detect single and double persistent scatterers (PSs) in urban built environments. By constructing a two-tier network, we can jointly detect single and double PSs with no need for preliminary removal of the atmospheric phase screen (APS) in the whole area. This technique is more applicable in high-rise built environments (e.g., Hong Kong) with cloudy and rainy weather where there is much uncertainty when removing the APS. In the first-tier network, we aim to detect the most reliable single PSs (SPSs) by constructing a Delaunay triangulation network. To improve the robustness of estimation, we combine beamforming with an M-estimator for parameter estimation at the arcs, and introduce a ridge-estimator for network adjustment. In the second-tier network, we detect the remaining SPSs and all of the double PSs (DPSs) by constructing local star networks that use the SPSs detected in the first-tier network as reference points. To simplify the detection of DPSs, we employ a local maximum ratio (LMR) method for extracting overlaid DPSs. Finally, TerraSAR-X images are used to validate the Tomo-PSInSAR method. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1109/IGARSS.2016.7729367 | 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Tomo-PSInSAR, Single and double persistent scatterers, M-estimator, Ridge-estimator, TerraSAR-X | Beamforming,Star network,Synthetic aperture radar,Computer science,Remote sensing,Robustness (computer science),Interferometry,Atmospheric phase screen,Estimation theory,Delaunay triangulation | Conference |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
2153-6996 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
4 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Peifeng Ma | 1 | 1 | 3.10 |
Hui Lin | 2 | 459 | 64.06 |
Fulong Chen | 3 | 12 | 6.51 |