Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The current paper provides a dialectical interpretation of the argumentation-based judgment aggregation operators of Caminada and Pigozzi. In particular, we define discussion-based proof procedures for the foundational concepts of down-admissible and up-complete. We then show how these proof procedures can be used as the basis of dialectical proof procedures for the sceptical, credulous and super credulous judgment aggregation operators. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-179 | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
judgment aggregation,proof procedures,discussion games | Computer science,Argumentation theory,Skepticism,Judgment aggregation,Natural language processing,Operator (computer programming),Artificial intelligence,Epistemology,Dialectic | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
287 | 0922-6389 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 10 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin W. A. Caminada | 1 | 865 | 46.84 |
| Richard F. Booth | 2 | 5 | 5.79 |