Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We incorporate logic programs (in particular Prolog) into reactive systems. We do this using Logic-labeled finitestate machines (LLFSMs), whose non-event-driven nature results in a deterministic schedule. We also advocate the use of a middleware under the Pull-approach, as opposed to the, currently very common, Push-approach, achieving deterministic semantics and the ability to ensure correctness in both the time and value domains. The deterministic schedule has other advantages, such as bounded resource use for inter-process communication as well as a smaller state space for formal verification. We demonstrate this architecture through a simple case study, contrasting the current prevalent Push approach in ROS [1] with the Pull approach recommended for LLFSMs. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1109/DCPS.2016.7588297 | 2016 1st CPSWeek Workshop on Declarative Cyber-Physical Systems (DCPS) |
Keywords | DocType | ISBN |
Software Models,Sequential Schedule,Logic-Programming,Reactive Systems,Logic-Labeled Finite-State Machines,Robotic Middleware. | Conference | 978-1-5090-1151-3 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.35 | 15 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| vladimir estivillcastro | 1 | 903 | 107.50 |
| René Hexel | 2 | 2 | 1.03 |
| Alberto Ramirez Regalado | 3 | 1 | 0.35 |